What's
the Real Deal About the Hampshire CLPP Reproductive Freedom Conference Using
Police to Eject Stop Patriarchy From Their Conference Under Threat of Arrest?
For a video explanation of what happened please watch:
We were motivated to attend by our overall opposition to the
war on women, but especially by the extremeness of the attacks on abortion in
the last few months. In addition to
learning from and connecting with others, we aimed to bring in a program of
mass political resistance and struggle to counter the spate of new laws,
threats, stigma and restrictions on abortion access throughout the country –
starting with the April 25th Student Day of Action for Abortion On
Demand and Without Apology and continuing through major plans this summer.
At the same time, StopPatriarchy.org sees the assault on the
right to abortion as the “mirror opposite” of the assault and violence against
women being mainstreamed through the increasingly degrading, cruel, brutal and
humiliating nature of pornography and the massive growth of the global sex
industry which has destroyed the lives of millions upon millions of women and
very young girls. This is something we
were prepared to engage people over. And
within all this, some of us were bringing the view of all-the-way revolution,
rooting the 40 years of backlash against women's rights as well as the New Jim
Crow and other crimes against the people in the system of
capitalism-imperialism and advocating for revolution and communism as it has
been re-envisioned by Bob Avakian [
http://revcom.us/avakian/index.html].
Differences in Approach Emerge the First Night
The first night of the CLPP conference
is an Abortion Speak
Out. With her permission, we will share
some of the story one of the women with Stop Patriarchy told during the Speak
Out. She said, “My abortion story is
very simple. I got pregnant, I didn't
want a baby, so I had an abortion. That
was it. It wasn't sad, it wasn't
agonizing, it was my decision and it was the right decision.” She expressed anger that abortion is so
difficult to access and so stigmatized, stating, “No one should ever be made to
feel guilty for getting an abortion! Fetuses are NOT babies. Abortion is NOT murder. Women are NOT incubators.”
While she spoke, a CLPP organizer held up a sign insisting
that she “use only 'I' statements.” All
we could deduce from this was that the organizer didn't like that our friend
said woman shouldn't feel guilty. (For a
fuller argument on why women should not feel guilty for abortion, see Sunsara
Taylor's piece
Should
a Woman Feel Sad About Her Abortion? Fuck No!)
Not everyone was preoccupied with “I” statements. Several women in the audience, at least one
of whom then got up later to tell about her abortion and who was clearly moved
and motivated by the approach taken by our friend, came up afterward with deep
appreciation.
Registering and Setting Up Our Stop Patriarchy Table
At lunch on the second day we registered, paid for and set
up our organizational table in the main conference area along with all the
other organization's tables.
Immediately, attendees (and folks from other tables) began visiting,
picking up literature and buying t-shirts which read “Abortion On Demand &
Without Apology!” and stickers which read “Imagine/Create a World Without Rape”
and “If You Can't Imagine Sex Without Porn, You're Fucked!”
While that went on, some of us went around with the call for
April 25th and got an extremely positive response from
attendees. Then we split up to attend
various workshops.
Participating in Workshops
Many of us spoke up in the workshops that we attended, and
at times this included questioning or challenging some of the assumptions of
some of the speakers. More than once we
challenged the idea that Obama is “our friend,” pointing out that he has
conciliated with and demobilized others in the face of the most extreme assault
on abortion since Roe v. Wade. We also
brought in that he is carrying out crimes against humanity with his use of
targeted assassinations through drones and through presiding over the torture
in Guantanamo. We argued against relying
on the Democrats and in favor of relying on ourselves to bring forward mass
political struggle to defeat the total war against abortion and birth control.
While we expressed differences at times with various
speakers (and leaders of CLPP), this was all well within the expressed unity
and purpose of the conference overall.
Even more, the spirit of our participation was to take part in open,
principled, and deep examination of how to understand the challenges we are
facing and what it truly will take to change the direction of all of society
around the assaults on women.
A Dinner Discussion on the Source and Solution to Women's
Oppresion –
And Frustration By Those Looking to Debate Porn
At dinner, Sunsara Taylor and those with the New York
Revolution Club among us invited attendees to join a “DIY” (do-it-yourself)
workshop at a big round table in the eating area (this is the same area where
the organizational tables were set up).
The workshop was called, “The Oppression of Women is NOT Human Nature,
It is the Nature of the System: Where this Oppression Comes from and the
Revolution We Need to End It.”
As we were about to get started, a group of about four
people came over to take part in what they thought
was going to be a discussion/debate about pornography and the sex
industry. Taylor apologized for what
appeared to have been a misunderstanding among our own group as to what the
topic was going to be. She explained
that while the workshop would encompass some discussion of porn, it wasn't
going to focus on it and made clear they were welcome to stay or they could
schedule another time to talk about porn specifically. A man in that group seemed annoyed and held
up a copy of the Stop Patriarchy Call to Action (which condemns porn), saying,
“I just think if you are going to have a discussion of sex work you ought to
have some sex workers present.”
As they walked away, a woman in that group said loudly, “Did
we just get kicked out of a discussion we were invited to be part of?” Taylor responded one more time, “To be clear,
we made a mistake among our group and didn't communicate clearly and I
apologize that you were given the impression we were holding a discussion on
porn.” She repeated the title of the
actual workshop and made clear again that they were invited to join in or we
would schedule something later that focuses on porn.
That group walked away and the DIY workshop commenced.
An Argument Over Porn and the Sex Industry at the Stop
Patriarchy Table
While most of the folks in our contingent turned our
attention to the workshop Taylor was conducting, the group that had come to
argue about pornography and “sex work” went over to the Stop Patriarchy table
and got in an argument there instead. As
far as the two Stop Patriarchy organizers who were at the table, this was not
only fine – it was welcome.
The pro-porn group brought to bear their personal
experiences with the “sex industry,” with sexual violence, and with sexual
practices including bondage, domination, and sado-masochism (BDSM). Our people kept posing that we are not in the
business of policing individual's consensual sexual behavior, but we do insist
that sexuality is not something that is formed for anyone in a vacuum. We live in a world that is saturated with
violence against and domination of women, a world that sexualizes degradation
and humiliation and we are not surprised that those ideas get reflected in
people's genuinely felt sexual desires.
Including by people who have been victims of sexual violence and by
people who in some ways may be seeking to oppose sexual violence and
oppression. But, you don't have the
“right” to market yourself as a sexual commodity outside of a world that gives
rise to the idea of women's bodies as commodities, as things to be used,
tortured, degraded and hurt for the sexual pleasure of men. And in that kind of world, this real world
that is bigger than any individual and which is what shapes and influences
individual's impulses, is littered with the bodies of literally millions upon
millions upon millions of women and very young girls who have been kidnapped,
pimped, beaten, tortured, sold by starving families, drugged and tricked, and
repeatedly raped and sold and then discarded as nothing more than unthinking
flesh.
If men have the “right” to buy women's bodies and
subordination, if men have the “right” to purchase and get off on images
depicting the objectification and humiliation and torture of women, then women
will never have the right to walk the earth free of being viewed as nothing
more than despised objects and free from the ever-present threat of being
attacked, raped, tortured, pimped, and in millions of other ways dehumanized
and degraded (including through the widespread humiliation in the mainstream
culture: rape jokes, dehumanizing ads, woman-hating music, and much more).
This conversation went on for a while and while it was
passionate, our people were calm, substantive and principled. They repeatedly refocused things on the need
to liberate the half of humanity that has been in chains for thousands of years
(women) and look at all these phenomenon from that vantage, not from one's own
narrow experience.
Our two members from StopPatriarchy also repeatedly
clarified our position. The pro-porn
group kept accusing us of shaming, blaming, stigmatizing and seeking to
criminalize women in the sex industry and we drew their attention to our Call
to Action which makes clear:
“Our purpose is NOT to lobby for new legislation to ban pornography
(“decency laws” have always served to further repress homosexuality,
boundary-challenging art, and scientific sex education). We oppose the
criminalization of women in the sex industry. Our mission is to challenge the
new generation in particular to reject this culture of rape and pornography, to
resist the shaming of women who have sex and/or abortions, to wage fierce
cultural and political resistance to wake others up, and to bring forward a
liberating culture that celebrates the full equality and liberation of women.”
Eventually this pro-porn group got frustrated and walked
away. Our members thought that was the
end of it.
CLPP Student Organizers and Mia Sullivan Arrive with
Campus Police
Apparently, however, this group didn't just walk away. They went to the CLPP organizers and told
them they felt that the conference was no longer a “safe space” because of our
presence at it.
Soon, a couple of CLPP student organizers appeared at the
Stop Patriarchy table followed almost immediately by CLPP Director Mia Sullivan
and Campus Police. They told our people
at the table that they had to pack up the table and leave immediately or be
arrested. The only explanation they gave
was that “students had complained that we had made the conference no longer a
safe space for them.”
To repeat and be very clear: the first time our organizers
were told to leave the police were already there. Neither the CLPP student organizers nor Mia
Sullivan asked our organizers about what had transpired. They did not ask others who had witnessed the
exchange. They did not seek to find a
way to discuss and resolve any potential problems or facilitate the principled
continued participation among people with divergent viewpoints at their
conference. They simply came over and
told our organizers to pack up and leave or be arrested.
After this happened, one of our organizers spoke for a few
minutes with one of the CLPP student organizers, clarifying once again that we
stand firmly against criminalizing or shaming people in the sex industry. For a moment, our organizer thought this was
part of a process of working through what had been a misunderstanding. But Mia Sullivan, who had been standing
nearby this whole time with police, intervened again making clear that nothing
was up for investigation or discussion and insisting once again that we
leave or be arrested.
When the rest of us noticed police and CLPP organizers
surrounding our table and came over to inquire what was going on, Mia Sullivan
refused to explain, simply stating, “I have already told one of your other
organizers and I am not going to explain myself.” The police then made clear that the rest of
us would also be arrested if we didn't immediately leave.
The police and Mia Sullivan hovered over us as we packed up
our table and carried the boxes to our car.
Campus police stood with our people in the darkened parking lot until we
loaded our car and took pictures of our license plate.
A Violation of CLPP's Own Principles
Even by the conference's own principles we never violated
anyone's “safe space.” It says very
clearly in the pamphlet “creating conference community: a guide to a Healthy
Conference Experience” put out by CLPP, in the section on “safety”:
“Protocol: ask for consent
to continue conversations that were begun earlier, allow the space for
people to leave a situation that is triggering, and be conscious
of how our questions or comments might be marginalizing or tokenizing.”
At every point people were free to “leave [the]
situation”! The pro-porn group had
approached our table, we didn't go up to them.
They had our Call to Action in hand.
They had at least read enough of it to know that we oppose porn and they
had come specifically to argue with us about that.
Is “safe space” to mean that people should be protected from
ideas that differ from their own?
Who could possibly have respect for a group that, when
approached, didn't even defend what they stood for?
It also states in CLPP's “Conference Community” pamphlet
that:
“We want all participants to
know that Hampshire College Campus Police officers will be around campus
during the conference weekend. These
officers are available to de-escalate situations if opponents of our
social justice causes become disruptive over the weekend. We recognize that our communities have
different histories with law enforcement and have worked with the officers
to raise awareness around these issues.”
First, it is outrageous that anyone can call themselves a
movement for social justice and rely on police and the force of the highly
repressive, oppressive and violent state that rules over the people. There is a long and well-documented history
of police and other state agencies fomenting divisions, setting people up, and
outright assassinating and wrongly imprisoning fighters for liberation. Calling police on others in the movement is
doing the work of the state.
Second, these officers were not called out against
“opponents of our social justice causes,” unless CLPP has some unspoken
official policy of upholding and defending the porn industry and the sexual
enslavement of women!
Stop Patriarchy did not violate any principles or standards
of CLPP as officially set forward. And,
as people with a well-documented track record of fighting on the front lines against
the various fronts of the war on women – traveling to Charlotte and to other
places where abortion clinics were under siege, spearheading for two years in a
row an abortion rights presence in both DC and Bay Area on the anniversaries of
Roe v. Wade, protesting at St. Patrick's Cathedral when Timothy Dolan who is
based there) led the attacks on birth control, taking over the original Hooters
Restaurant and various porn stores in Times Square, joining in the outpourings
against rape and sexual violence and much, much more – we could hardly be
called “opponents... of social justice causes.”
(Unless – again – upholding porn and the sexual enslavement of women is
an unspoken official policy of CLPP!)
Third, the police were not used to “de-escalate [the]
situation.” Quite the opposite; the
“situation” had ended. It was calling in
the police and using them to suppress and expel, under threat of arrest, a
differing political view that was peacefully expressed, that was the “escalating.”
Sunday Morning – One Last Attempt to Participate
On Sunday morning, Stop Patriarchy decided to go back to the
campus in the hope of participating in the final sessions of the CLPP
conference. We did this both because we
felt that the use of police against us set a terrible precedent that had to be
opposed, and because we wanted to reconnect with the people we'd met to make
the April 25th day of action as powerful as possible.
Our time back at the conference was short. Within minutes of our arrival, CLPP
organizers (including, once again Mia Sullivan) appeared with campus police
(more of them this time) and threatened us with arrest if we did not leave
immediately. One of the officers grabbed
Sunsara Taylor by the arm even as she was already walking towards the
exit. He only stopped, from what we
could tell, because two of the people with her started yelling at them to take
their hands off her and many students were around witnessing all this with
alarm.
We had handed out some copies of the
statement that
we had printed up at our hotel protesting the use of police to eject us from
the conference and very quickly were escorted by police back to our van.
By coincidence, one of the CLPP student organizers who
emceed a portion of a plenary session and been present at one point as police
were forcing us to leave walked past our van as we were approaching it. One of us called out to her, “How does it
feel to call the police on revolutionaries?
Does it make you feel powerful?
Does it make you feel good?”
She looked squarely at us and said, “You people are foul.”
We found this shocking and asked what exactly she thought
we'd done.
She insisted that the police had only been called only after
we refused student organizers' requests that we leave. This, as we've addressed, is untrue. She also claimed that “people had been
complaining to us about you since you arrived.”
This is something that, if true, neither corresponded to the overall extremely
favorable response we had been getting from those we were interacting with nor
was it (if true) ever raised to us by CLPP organizers. But her claims and the disgust with which she
addressed us did make us wonder what exactly is being claimed about us among other CLPP organizers.
But “You Made Someone Cry”
One of the accusations that has come at us since the
conference is that “we made someone cry” during the argument at our table.
While it is true that someone cried, two things must be
said.
First, “making someone cry” is not a criminal offense.
Second, it is wrong to assume that just because someone
cried that Stop Patriarchy had done something wrong. How could a movement possibly confront the
oppression and enslavement of women – how widespread it is throughout the whole
world and how deeply it wounds people into their most intimate and personal places
– without it sometimes calling forth very deep emotions? There had been many instances throughout the
conference – including during the Abortion Speak Out as well as other instances
– where people were in tears. Should the
organizers of the Speak Out therefore be arrested? Of course not!
Stop Patriarchy makes a principle of not blaming or shaming
people for their experiences or desires and this was the approach taken by
those at our table. This is not,
however, a guarantee that no one will ever be upset. Always, we give people space to disengage if
don't feel comfortable pursuing a discussion further. This, too, was the case during this discussion,
everyone was free to walk away from our table at any time.
One Final Irony
As we put it in our open letter to the CLPP organizers and
Hampshire community:
“Finally, it is a bitter irony
that your conference included numerous workshops on 'state violence,' 'racial
justice,' and the 'prison industrial complex' yet one of the people you called
the police on is a young Black man who has been Stopped & Frisked growing
up in Brooklyn more times than he can remember.
This young man decided to put his body on the line and face up to a year
in jail when he joined in the campaign of mass civil disobedience against Stop
& Frisk last year together with Carl Dix, Cornel West, and dozens of
others. It is a further bitter irony
that your conference held workshops and gave voice extensively to concerns
about making the conference welcoming and safe for LGBT people, yet one of the
people you called the police on is a transgender person who has (owing to the
obvious dangers which face transgender people particularly at the hands of
police and in jail) has judiciously calculated which political activities to
take part in specifically to avoid the risk of arrest. Neither of these people imagined that a
conference on 'Abortion Rights' and 'Social Justice' would be the place where
they faced the greatest threat of being imprisoned!”
Join Us In Protesting This Outrageous Action By CLPP
Please join us in demanding an apology from CLPP and that
they open up a forum to StopPatriarchy to come back up and present our views to
the Hampshire community free from threat or suppression. Send a message through our website: http://stoppatriarchy.org/opposesuppression
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home